This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

GP services cannot be 'rated out of ten'

Written by: | Published:

GP services cannot be rated GP services cannot be rated

To improve healthcare, the effectiveness of services must be measured. But it must be done carefully, addressing issues that matter, in a way that provides an accurate reflection of the quality of care provided.

This is tricky to achieve in any sector and particularly in healthcare, where a patient's agenda may differ from that of a health professional or the NHS; emotions run high; and poor service really can mean the difference between life and death.

So it comes as a surprise that ministers feel the best way of evaluating GP practices is to rate them 'out of 10' in the manner of Tripadvisor, a travel website that compiles star ratings of venues and restaurants.

What is vital to measure in general practice is surely accuracy of diagnosis and use of appropriate, evidence-based prescribing and referral. However, surgeries are to be rated on opening hours; ease of getting an appointment; time spent waiting in reception; and whether or not health professionals listen. An overall rating for each surgery will be published online by NHS Choices.

Ministers claim this will 'make it easier for patients to find the best NHS care for them', enabling people to find surgeries with experience of treating particular conditions. The BMA describes the system as a 'blunt instrument', warning it fails to take account of challenges faced by individual practices. The criticisms are manifold: the scoring system is simplistic, preventing patients from giving detail; ratings can be highly subjective; and people with grievances are more likely to respond than those happy with their practice. Moving surgery may be tricky if there are few local practices and the good ones are all over-subscribed.

Despite this, the system has been put in place 'with immediate effect', proving that ministers are better at asking other professionals to listen to feedback, than they are at listening themselves.

Sarah Wild, editor, Independent Nurse

What do you think? Leave a comment below or tweet your views to @IndyNurseMag

This material is protected by MA Healthcare Ltd copyright.
See Terms and Conditions.

Comments

Name
 
Email
 
Comments
 

Please view our Terms and Conditions before leaving a comment.

Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 

Most read articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Practice Nursing Journal latest issue and most read articles.

Click here to read a selection of free to access articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Newsletter

Sign up to the newsletter

About

Independent Nurse is the professional resource for primary care and community nurses, providing clinical articles for practice nurses and prescribers.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with the latest nursing news.

Stay Connected

Stay social with Independent Nurse by following us on Twitter, liking us on Facebook or connecting on LinkedIn.

Archive

Need access to some of our older articles? You can view our archive, or alternatively contact us.

Contact Us

MA Healthcare Ltd.
St Jude's Church, Dulwich Road
London, SE24 0PB

Tel: +44 (0)20 7738 5454
Registered in England and Wales No. 01878373

Meet the team

Authors

Find out how to contribute to Independent Nurse here.