The RCN has expressed concern that the new bill is not fit for purpose, after the Regulatory Policy Committee released an opinion condemning it.
The an independent body released its report ahead of the bill’s second reading in the House of Lords. It found that the UK government had not considered all impacts of the bill and had not backed up its assumptions with evidence.
It also found that the government had not properly assessed how the bill could make strikes worse, nor did it consider or discuss the rationale behind workers’ decisions to strike.
To read more on this subject, visit:
- Government and RCN to begin talks over pay
- No services will be exempt in largest nurses strike ever
- Concerns raised over drop in applications to study nursing
‘This is a damning assessment of the government’s attempt to stifle the rights of workers,’ said RCN General Secretary and Chief Executive Pat Cullen.
‘The independent committee is saying the bill is not fit for purpose and should essentially go ‘back to the drawing board’.
The bill proposes that there should be a basic level of service when industrial action takes place. This would allow an employer to bring an injunction to prevent strike action and to seek damages afterwards if trade unions don’t comply. It also introduces the possibility of nursing staff being sacked for taking otherwise lawful strike action.
‘The government is ploughing ahead with an ill thought through bill that allows for nursing staff to be sacked for taking otherwise lawful strike action,’ added Ms Cullen.
“Ministers would be better listening to the mounting opposition, drop the bill entirely and work with unions to resolve these disputes.’