This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Appointment of NMC chair causes 'grave concern'

Written by: | Published:

1/8/2012

The NMC has expressed 'grave concerns' about the way in which its new chair, appointed last month, was selected.

The DH has confirmed that Mark Addison, currently non-executive director at the National Archives, will take up the post in autumn for an initial period of 18 months. Mr Adams has previously held several senior positions in the Civil Service, as well as roles at Number 10 and the Cabinet Office.

Health secretary Andrew Lansley said Mr Addison had 'the experience and ability' to turn around the beleaguered regulator, which was heavily criticised in a strategic review by the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence earlier this month.

'I will make sure he gets all the support he needs in the task of improving the organisation,' Mr Lansley added.

However, a statement by the NMC said that although it acknowledged Mr Addison's appointment, it had 'grave concern regarding the appointment selection and lack of an open, transparent and equal opportunities process to demonstrate how this person meets the specifications for the Chair laid out in the CHRE report'.

It continued: 'In the interest of stability, the Council will work with Mark to continue building public and professional confidence in the NMC as an effective and efficient regulator, focusing on our key regulatory function, the protection of the public.'

The RCN welcomed the appointment of a 'credible, experienced individual', and said it would seek a meeting with the new chair as a matter of urgency, to discuss a proposed 58 per cent increase in the NMC registration fee.

On his appointment, Mr Addison said he was looking forward to the role. 'Addressing the findings of the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence report will be a big challenge,' he said.

'But that report makes clear that the organisation is moving in the right direction and that the staff have the ability and motivation to manage these changes and emerge stronger. That gives a strong platform on which to build.'

What do you think? Leave a comment below or tweet your views to @IndyNurseMag

This material is protected by MA Healthcare Ltd copyright.
See Terms and Conditions.

Comments

Name
 
Email
 
Comments
 

Please view our Terms and Conditions before leaving a comment.

Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 

Most read articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Practice Nursing Journal latest issue and most read articles.

Click here to read a selection of free to access articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Newsletter

Sign up to the newsletter

About

Independent Nurse is the professional resource for primary care and community nurses, providing clinical articles for practice nurses and prescribers.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with the latest nursing news.

Stay Connected

Stay social with Independent Nurse by following us on Twitter, liking us on Facebook or connecting on LinkedIn.

Archive

Need access to some of our older articles? You can view our archive, or alternatively contact us.

Contact Us

MA Healthcare Ltd.
St Jude's Church, Dulwich Road
London, SE24 0PB

Tel: +44 (0)20 7738 5454
Registered in England and Wales No. 01878373

Meet the team

Authors

Find out how to contribute to Independent Nurse here.