This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

Cervical screening: services in ‘meltdown’

Written by: | Published:

Just nine labs remain open PHE is trying to increase uptake, but experts fear delays in test results coming through

The closure of 41 laboratories coinciding with the launch of a new awareness campaign has left cervical screening services in meltdown, a leading expert has said.

Alison Cropper, the chair of the British Association for Cytopathology and a consultant biomedical scientist, said Public Health England’s campaign had been launched at ‘the worst time there could possibly have been. ‘The service is in meltdown, she said.

Prof Anne Mackie, the director of screening at Public Health England, said: ‘Screening can stop cancer before it starts and estimates show that if everyone attended regularly, 83% of deaths could be prevented. Since the programme began an estimated 5,000 lives a year have been saved, but cervical screening numbers are at a 20-year low. That is why we launched this campaign.

The total number of laboratories available has fallen from 50 to just 9. Experts fear that this will cause ‘unacceptable delays’ to cervical screening results.

‘HPV primary testing is a fantastic advancement in our cervical screening programme yet the roll out of this new testing method comes at a time when cervical screening attendance is at its lowest,’ said Robert Music, Chief Executive, Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust. ‘Campaigns to reverse this are needed more than ever however for those working in laboratories, this means additional workload during a period of upheaval and uncertainty.

‘Our laboratory staff are critical to delivering a safe and effective programme and it is essential that they have the resource and support they need to do this otherwise we will just see increased dissatisfaction amongst the workforce and increased waiting times for women which is simply not fair. We cannot afford for public trust and confidence to be lost in our programme as this could result in an even greater decline in attendance.”

What do you think? Leave a comment below or tweet your views to @IndyNurseMag

This material is protected by MA Healthcare Ltd copyright.
See Terms and Conditions.

Comments

Name
 
Email
 
Comments
 

Please view our Terms and Conditions before leaving a comment.

Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 

Most read articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Practice Nursing Journal latest issue and most read articles.

Click here to read a selection of free to access articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Newsletter

Sign up to the newsletter

About

Independent Nurse is the professional resource for primary care and community nurses, providing clinical articles for practice nurses and prescribers.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with the latest nursing news.

Stay Connected

Stay social with Independent Nurse by following us on Twitter, liking us on Facebook or connecting on LinkedIn.

Archive

Need access to some of our older articles? You can view our archive, or alternatively contact us.

Contact Us

MA Healthcare Ltd.
St Jude's Church, Dulwich Road
London, SE24 0PB

Tel: +44 (0)20 7738 5454
Registered in England and Wales No. 01878373

Meet the team

Authors

Find out how to contribute to Independent Nurse here.