This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

George Osborne urged to reverse public health budget cuts

Written by: | Published:

Public health budget cuts will hit the NHS Public health budget cuts will hit the NHS

Chancellor of the exchequer George Osborne should reconsider the decision to slash £200 million from public health budget, according to a letter from several healthcare bodies.

The letter, signed by organisations such as the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), the Faculty of Public Health, and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, suggests that the NHS will have to ‘pick up the pieces’ by treating conditions that could have been prevented. It also states that investing in public health services such as smoking cessation and weight management will save money in the long run, which will help to tackle the wider budget deficit.

Cutting public health budgets is short sighted and will end up costing the health service more in the long-term,’ said Janet Davies, chief executive of the RCN. ‘More importantly, these cuts will have a devastating impact on people. Well-funded public health services keep people healthy and teach them to keep themselves healthy. The benefits, both financially and personally, far outweigh the costs.’

The decision to cut the public health budget, announced on 5 June, has provoked concerns that the provision of services will increase pressure on primary care. It has also been suggested that London will be disproportionately affected by the cuts, with local authorities in the city losing as much as £40 million from public health budgets.

‘These cuts fly in the face of common sense. Not only do they hit the poorest and most vulnerable the hardest they will also result in untold additional costs to the NHS budget,’ said Professor Sue Bailey, chair of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. ‘Public health spending should be at the heart of our overall health policy, not something that can be cut at whim. Local authorities are already struggling to deliver health services in communities. This ‘in-year’ cut, just made that task a whole lot harder.’

What do you think? Leave a comment below or tweet your views to @IndyNurseMag

This material is protected by MA Healthcare Ltd copyright.
See Terms and Conditions.

Comments

Name
 
Email
 
Comments
 

Please view our Terms and Conditions before leaving a comment.

Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 

Most read articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Practice Nursing Journal latest issue and most read articles.

Click here to read a selection of free to access articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Newsletter

Sign up to the newsletter

About

Independent Nurse is the professional resource for primary care and community nurses, providing clinical articles for practice nurses and prescribers.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with the latest nursing news.

Stay Connected

Stay social with Independent Nurse by following us on Twitter, liking us on Facebook or connecting on LinkedIn.

Archive

Need access to some of our older articles? You can view our archive, or alternatively contact us.

Contact Us

MA Healthcare Ltd.
St Jude's Church, Dulwich Road
London, SE24 0PB

Tel: +44 (0)20 7738 5454
Registered in England and Wales No. 01878373

Meet the team

Authors

Find out how to contribute to Independent Nurse here.