This site is intended for healthcare professionals only

NHS banning 'wasteful' prescriptions for savings

Written by: | Published:

Where could the money saved go? Where could the money saved go?

Alternative treatments such as homeopathy will no longer be a ‘drain’ on NHS resources as they are to be taken off prescription in a large-scale bid to save money.

NHS England has launched a public consultation on its detailed plans, which aim to save £141 million a year by cutting out prescriptions of 18 specified treatments. The money would then be reinvested into the generation of newer, more effective medicines.

READ MORE: NHS targets 'low value' prescriptions for cuts

Homeopathy, one of the key targets of the plans, was described by NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens as ‘at best a placebo and a misuse of scarce NHS funds’. A further 3,200 prescription items already available over the counter at pharmacies and in retail outlets are being eyed for cutting.

Mr Stevens said: ‘The NHS is probably the world’s most efficient health service, but like every country there is still waste and inefficiency that we’re determined to root out.

READ MORE: Nurses could start prescribing sooner under proposed rule changes

‘The public rightly expects that the NHS will use every pound wisely, and today we’re taking practical action to free up funding to better spend on modern drugs and treatments.’

Initial action to limit prescribing of products such as cough mixture, eye drops, laxatives and sun cream would seek to save £50-100 million a year in taxpayers’ money.

Restricting the availability of gluten-free foods on prescription to save £26 million a year, is an idea currently subject to a Department of Health consultation. NHS England expressed their support.

READ MORE: Investigation launched into online primary care services giving 17-second prescriptions

NHS England medical director Bruce Keogh said: ‘At a time when we need to find all the money we can for new, highly effective drugs we must ensure every pound is spent wisely.

‘An honest, plain English conversation is required about what we should fund and what we should not. We need to end unnecessary expense to give us a bigger therapeutic bang for the NHS buck so we cut the fat and build the therapeutic muscle.’

What do you think? Leave a comment below or tweet your views to @IndyNurseMag

This material is protected by MA Healthcare Ltd copyright.
See Terms and Conditions.

Comments

Name
 
Email
 
Comments
 

Please view our Terms and Conditions before leaving a comment.

Change the CAPTCHA codeSpeak the CAPTCHA code
 

Most read articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Practice Nursing Journal latest issue and most read articles.

Click here to read a selection of free to access articles from Practice Nursing Journal

Newsletter

Sign up to the newsletter

About

Independent Nurse is the professional resource for primary care and community nurses, providing clinical articles for practice nurses and prescribers.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay up to date with the latest nursing news.

Stay Connected

Stay social with Independent Nurse by following us on Twitter, liking us on Facebook or connecting on LinkedIn.

Archive

Need access to some of our older articles? You can view our archive, or alternatively contact us.

Contact Us

MA Healthcare Ltd.
St Jude's Church, Dulwich Road
London, SE24 0PB

Tel: +44 (0)20 7738 5454
Registered in England and Wales No. 01878373

Meet the team

Authors

Find out how to contribute to Independent Nurse here.